On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > >> On Tue May 15 14:54:01 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 07:21:44 Andy Dougherty wrote: >> > >> > > [appending to an old ticket, since if anyone wants to ever get this >> > > working again, they'll probably have to fix up the blind guesses I >> > made in >> > > that old patch too.] >> > >> > Thanks, applied as r18562 (er, oops -- r18561, due to an >> > excruciatingly slow >> > commit). >> > >> > -- c >> > >> >> If the patch is applied, is this ticket safe to close now? > > No. It's still the case that the sun4/SPARC jit is broken. The patch > just documented two things: which specific function does not exist, and > which other broken functions also need to be fixed. > > However, realistically, I don't think anyone's ever going to fix the SPARC > jit, so you may certainly mark it as "stalled" or whatever else seems to > suit. >
Is it only sun4/SPARC that's broken or are all Solaris/SPARC's also broken? I would guess that if its all SPARCs, Linux or Solaris, that this might be a bigger issue. Steve Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
