It could be a pmc instead of a class. How about :type ? On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob Rogers wrote: >> >> From: Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 00:25:35 +0200 >> >> Hi, >> >> In Perl 6 we need to be able to have Parrot subs take on a range of >> different types . . . >> >> Is the idea sane, and is the name of the adverb OK? If so, I'll go ahead >> and implement it (with changes as needed). >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jonathan >> >> It is a good idea. I think I would call it ":class", though. >> > > I did ponder that, and then worried that people would confuse it with > putting a method into a certain class, which isn't what this is for... > > Jonathan > > >
-- Will "Coke" Coleda
