On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:07:27AM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > On Sat May 10 20:42:00 2008, tene wrote: > > 19:13 <@pmichaud> so, set $PX[$PX], $PX is calling set_pmc_keyed even > > when [$PX] is an Integer > > 19:31 <@pmichaud> $P1[$P2] always invokes get_pmc_keyed and never > > get_pmc_keyed_int > > 19:31 <@pmichaud> that's a bit of a problem for aggregates that have > > both hash keys and int keys > > > > There is some inline PIR in rakudo that needs to be removed when this is > > fixed. Check r27433. > > I think it's arguable that the current behavior is correct; If you want > to use the keyed int syntax, isn't: > > $I0 = $P1 > $P2[$I0] > > the proper way to trigger that?
Yes. But this also means that we have to have separate PAST node types for keyed versus keyed_int. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it does increase the amount of code a bit. (And yes, this is the approach I'm planning to adopt for the time being.) Pm
