? Multiple-assignment second-class? I don't see how you get that out of Larry's message...
On 4/21/08, TSa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HaloO, > > Larry Wall wrote: > > That is, coro and loop tend to violate single-assignment semantics, and > > single-assignment semantics are easier to map into functional semantics. > > > > So if we do allow coro in Perl 6, it'll probably be a second-class > > citizen like loop and goto and die (and anything else considered > > harmful but useful). But I don't see much use for it offhand. > > Does that imply that multiple assignment is second-class, too? > And that with a language that provides the concept of eternal > equality with ===, or checking of referential identity with =:=. > Big surprise that is. > > > Regards, TSa. > -- > > "The unavoidable price of reliability is simplicity" > -- C.A.R. Hoare > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
