On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Nuno 'smash' Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:18 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:02:23 Nuno 'smash' Carvalho wrote: > > > > > I just posted a little Parrot benchmark in my use.perl's journal that > > > i think it would be interesting for everyone to take a look. From my > > > point of view Parrot finished in a very comfortable place between > > > compiled and interpreted languages. I've made the benchmarking very > > > easy to run, so do let me know if you want me to run it against any > > > patch or maybe a specific Parrot version. > > > > Which flags did you use for Parrot? Offhand, I suspect -Cj and -Ot would > be > > useful. > > Every one of them ran with default options. > > > > I doubt there's much improvement after 26920 and 26928, but it would be > > interesting to see if there's any. > > I can run to compare different Parrot revisions, just let me know the > revisions you want me to test. > > > -- c
Not sure what you were aiming at, but you might want to take a look at: http://use.perl.org/~smash/journal/36139 ./smash
