On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:08:58PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote: : I don't see that this is any harder; unless I'm misunderstanding you, : this is just another normal closure usage case. The OUTER scope is : always the one defined by outersub, no matter how many calls back in the : dynamic chain it might be.
Yes, OUTER is necessarily always a particular lexical scope known at compile time. Which is why we have CALLER for the other case. :) Larry
