On Fri Mar 21 09:03:08 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > there is a definition on my system for PARROT_HAS_SNPRINTF, but not a > definition for PARROT_HAS_C99_SNPRINTF. I assume, on first glance that > these two macros are one in the same and should be united.
They are not. Please see the code in config/auto/snprintf/test.in - this is a C program built and run by Configure.pl, to determine which flavor of snprintf exists on a platform. The semantics of the return value differ. So I don't think we should unite those two definitions. Were there some warnings you were trying to fix? If so, what were the warnings? We can try to find another way to fix them; please reopen the ticket if this is the case. Mark
