chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:55:30 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Am confused. What diagnostic output beyond 'prove -v' are you referring
to?
For example...
t/op/arithmetics....1..26
ok 1 - take the negative of a native integer
ok 2 - take the absolute of a native integer
ok 3 - add native integer to native integer
ok 4 - subtract native integer from native integer
ok 5 - multiply native integer with native integer
ok 6 - divide native integer by native integer
not ok 7 - turn a native number into its negative
... diagnostic output missing right here...
ok 8 - take the absolute of a native number
The test expected the output:
-0.000000
0.000000
-123.456789
123.456789
-0.000000
0.000000
-123.456789
123.456789
Obviously it received something else. What did it receive?
As far as I know, Visual C++ is a bit shaky on the arithmetic side with
regards to +/- 0.0. For example, the constant C<-0.0> is turned into
C<0.0>. One has to revert to hacks like C<-1.0 * 0.0>, if I recall
correctly.
t/op/arithmetics.t
not ok 7 - turn a native number into its negative
# Failed test 'turn a native number into its negative'
# at t\op\arithmetics.t line 210.
# got: '0.000000
# 0.000000
# -123.456789
# 123.456789
# 0.000000
# 0.000000
# -123.456789
# 123.456789
# '
# expected: '-0.000000
# 0.000000
# -123.456789
# 123.456789
# -0.000000
# 0.000000
# -123.456789
# 123.456789
# '
t/op/sprintf.t
not ok 157 - [%.0g] C99 standard mandates minus sign but C89 does not
skip: MSWin32 VMS hpux:10.20 openbsd netbsd:1.5 irix actual: >0<
t/pmc/complex.t
not ok 48 - sinh of complex numbers
# Failed test 'sinh of complex numbers'
# at t\pmc\complex.t line 1647.
# got: '
# sinh(0-2i)
# got 0.000000-0.909297i
# not -0.000000-0.909297i
#
# sinh(0+2i)
# got 0.000000+0.909297i
# not -0.000000+0.909297i
# done
# '
# expected: 'done
# '
t/pmc/float.t
not ok 23 - neg 0
# Failed test 'neg 0'
# at t\pmc\float.t line 547.
# '0'
# doesn't match '/^-0/
# '
Ron
