On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:06:22AM -0700, jerry gay wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > ... are we at or near a point that past-pm could be removed > > from the repository? What languages or tools are still using PAST-pm ? > > > ack -af PAST-pm, on a recent revision suggests the following files > mention PAST-pm: > compilers\past-pm\Makefile > compilers\past-pm\PAST-pm.pbc > compilers\past-pm\PAST-pm.pir > compilers\pct\README > compilers\pct\src\PAST.pir > config\gen\makefiles\past-pm.in > DEPRECATED.pod > languages\lua\doc\status.pod > languages\lua\src\lua51.pir > languages\pheme\pheme.pir > languages\plumhead\ChangeLog > lib\Parrot\Docs\Section\Compilers.pm > MANIFEST > MANIFEST.generated > NEWS > runtime\parrot\library\PAST-pm.pbc > t\compilers\past-pm\hllcompiler.t > t\compilers\past-pm\past.t > t\compilers\past-pm\post.t > > paring down this list and searching the handful of remaining files for > valid content seems like a good CAGE task.
Paring down the list reveals just three places that need to be updated or checked: languages\lua\doc\status.pod languages\lua\src\lua51.pir languages\pheme\pheme.pir I've already removed the reference to past-pm in lib/Parrot/Docs/Section/Compilers.pm, and the remaining references will all be eliminated as part of removing past-pm itself from the repository (or are documentation where the reference doesn't matter). Pm
