On Thu Jan 10 17:48:44 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu Jan 10 13:38:26 2008, coke wrote: > > Looks good, thanks! A few minor minor nits which are just book-keeping > > tasks: > > Thanks for the feedback. I've cleaned up those book-keeping items as > well as fixed a couple of end's that should have been .return()'s. > Attached is the revised patch. > > I'll be submitting similar patches for other tests in t/pmc/*.t > > -Mark >
Thanks, applied as r24791
