On Dec 17, 11:35 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Cochrane) wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane > # Please include the string: [perl #48749] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL:http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48749> > > I'm currently getting the following failure on Win32 (VisualStudio > 2005, ActiveState Perl, r24008): > > # Failed test (t/examples/tutorial.t at line 247) > t/examples/tutorial..........................NOK 35# got: 'before if > # after if > # > # before unless > # is printed > # after unless > # -0.0 was false > # NaN was false > # ' > # expected: 'before if > # after if > # > # before unless > # is printed > # after unless > # -0.0 was false > # ' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 35. > t/examples/tutorial..........................dubious > Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > DIED. FAILED test 35 > Failed 1/35 tests, 97.14% okay > > D:\parrot_msvc>more myconfig > Summary of my parrot 0.5.0 (r0) configuration: > configdate='Mon Dec 17 09:30:23 2007 GMT' > Platform: > osname=MSWin32, archname=MSWin32-x86-multi-thread > jitcapable=1, jitarchname=i386-MSWin32, > jitosname=MSWIN32, jitcpuarch=i386 > execcapable=1 > perl=C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe > Compiler: > cc='cl', ccflags='-nologo -GF -W4 -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_CONSOLE > -DNO_S > TRICT -DNO_HASH_SEED -DUSE_SITECUSTOMIZE -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE > -DHASATTRI > BUTE_DEPRECATED -wd4101 -DHASATTRIBUTE_NORETURN -wd4101', > Linker and Libraries: > ld='link', ldflags='-nologo -nodefaultlib', > cc_ldflags='/link', > libs='kernel32.lib ws2_32.lib msvcrt.lib oldnames.lib' > Dynamic Linking: > share_ext='.dll', ld_share_flags='-dll', > load_ext='.dll', ld_load_flags='-dll' > Types: > iv=long, intvalsize=4, intsize=4, opcode_t=long, opcode_t_size=4, > ptrsize=4, ptr_alignment=1 byteorder=1234, > nv=double, numvalsize=8, doublesize=8 > > I don't know if this is a problem with my setup as it seems that other > people aren't seeing this (AFAIKT from p2p). > > Paul
I have the same failure. Maybe we should skip this test for the release; some work needs to be done with the NaN stuff apparently. kjs