On Friday 07 December 2007 11:22:10 Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > According to the spec, this is a bug. > > Now, this isn't a big deal, because the semantics of the program aren't > changed. The only problem I can imagine is for embedders, but I'm not sure > if you can poke into parrot registers from a C program. If you can, and you > expect something to be there because you stuffed it into a PASM style > register (not symbolic PIR reg), then things go wrong.
Let it be known that any C program that pokes into Parrot registers is in a state of sin, and if the program breaks because of it, we shall all point and laugh. -- c
