On Tuesday 09 October 2007 19:05:09 Will Coleda wrote: > Isn't this change modifying the test? (looks from the comment like > this was supposed to be checking needs_destroy)
Yep. Reverted (and then fixed) in 22114. Good catch. -- c
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 19:05:09 Will Coleda wrote: > Isn't this change modifying the test? (looks from the comment like > this was supposed to be checking needs_destroy)
Yep. Reverted (and then fixed) in 22114. Good catch. -- c