On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> On Mon Mar 19 15:59:44 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Monday 19 March 2007 12:22, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > > I found the ticket that introduced this failing behavior, so I'm
> resending
> > > my message below with a fixed-up subject line to enter into RT. In
> brief,
> > > this patch incorrectly assumes that all compilers accept a '-h',
> '--help',
> > > or '/?' switch. Any compiler that doesn't is deemed 'not found', and
> > > there is no way to override it. Extending the list of options to try is
> > > not a sensible forward-looking portable strategy.
> >
> > I realize this patch precludes cross-compilation at the moment, but
> does it
> > work better for you, Andy?
>
> Applied the patch with some modifications so that it runs correctly on
> Windows in r21212. Tested on Linux x86, Windows and Cygwin.
But did you actually address any of my objections? For example, do you
now pay attention to exit codes? Do cc_build and cc_run now have exit
codes?
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
