On 8/29/07, Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/08/2007, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > as it turns out, the function can return any integer, so the code must > > be updated. but why isn't that function in the tags file? > > I was trying to work that out just recently as well. For some reason > ctags isn't picking up functions defined in imcc properly. I had a > look in the tags file generated by ctags, and the functions exist, but > when one tries to use vim to go to the function, it complains that > such a function doesn't exist. Odd. Haven't come up with a solution > though... > turns out the reason is our macros NOTNULL() and NULLOK()
ctags sees C<foo(NOTNULL(...), ...)> and selects C<NOTNULL> as the function name instead of C<foo>. is there anything we can do to prevent this, or is it time to submit a bug for ctags? ~jerry
