On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:19:22 -0500 Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 2007, at 7:15 PM, David Romano wrote: > > > The patch splits string.t (originally almost 3000 lines) into > > different > > files, as well as moves some of the tests for sprintf into > > t/op/sprintf_tests. > > Why is this a good thing, to be splitting up the files like this? I > can see sprintf getting their own, but why is 3000 lines a bad thing? First thing that comes to mind, splitting it up associates the individual tests with more descriptive filenames, which makes it easier to see what broke at a glance. My $0.02, Mark
