On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> >This presumes that every PMC class also has a Namespace PMC associated
> >with it that points to the class. I'm not sure that's true for Parrot PMC
> >classes.
> >
> It's what I've implemented, though whether it's The Design is another
> question that I'm not clear on the answer to.
Following up on this post, in #parrotsketch last week:
<pmichaud> the closest we have at the moment is
$P0 = get_root_namespace ['parrot'; 'Integer'] \
$P1 = new $P0
<pmichaud> but even this assumes that the 'Integer' namespace
is tied to the Integer class, which also hasn't been specced
<allison> they will be tied
<pmichaud> jonathan and I remarked on this in a m/l thread at YAPC
<allison> if it isn't mentioned in the PMC PDD it will be
<pmichaud> okay
<pmichaud> if that doesn't get added in the next day or so
I'll add a ticket or a patch
I haven't added the ticket or patch yet, but will do so.
Pm
