Bob Rogers wrote: > . . . > > I think you will have to send me your test case, or at least a more > detailed recipe. I do not see how the above sequence of events can lead > to a dangling reference to a deleted sub -- unless there is also a GC > bug, in which case I am unlikely to be able to reproduce the problem > from just a description.
I'm sorry -- I wrongly assumed that marking a context doesn't mark its current_sub, but it does. I thought it wasn't necessary (lexpad holds all the info we'd need). The segfault I got must have been a symptom from another GC bug. Thanks for checking my patch. -- Bram Geron | GPG 0xE7B9E65E
