On 6/29/07, via RT Paul Cochrane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane # Please include the string: [perl #43417] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43417 > Hi all, As part of going through and converting internal_exception()s to real_exception()s (see RT#40392) I've found several functions which could use real_exception(), but to use this they would have to have the interpreter passed in as an argument, hence changing their API. Is it worth changing these functions' API just for a real_exception()? Comments most definitely welcome! Paul
Hi Paul just a short thought. Apparently the exception can be caught, as it is a real exception, not a fatal (internal) exception; thus apparently if it is possible (if the situation is considered appropiate) to do so, then the interpreter structure is needed, otherwise it's just not possible. So, in other words, I think it would be well worth it to adjust the API, as it is only a single extra argument, and it makes behaviour/expectations more consistent and correct. just my 2c, kjs
