Larry Wall writes: > I have a problem with both extremes, and I want to solve it with a > dose of postmodern apathy. It may seem a bit insane, but I think that > in > > print qq:to/END/ > > =for whatever > > END > > I would prefer that the =for is considered Pod by any standard Pod > parser, but is *not* considered Pod by the Perl 6 parser. And I think > that's just fine.
I like it! Is that a decision yet, or were you just thinking out loud? Smylers
