Is there a reason we use memcpy( dest, src, sizeof(FOO) );
instead of *dest = *src;The latter should be the exact same code, but be much less likely to be screwed up.
At the very least we should be using: memcpy( dest, src, sizeof(*dest) );Of course, I'm only talking about when we're passing around structs. Clearly this won't work everywhere.
-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
