I had similar failures here where I got '0' vs. some other number.

$ prove -v t/postconfigure/03-revision.t
t/postconfigure/03-revision....1..7
ok 1 - use Cwd;
ok 2 - use File::Copy;
ok 3 - use File::Temp;
ok 4 - current revision is all numeric
ok 5 - current revision is all numeric

#   Failed test 'current and config are identical'
#   at t/postconfigure/03-revision.t line 32.
not ok 6 - current and config are identical
#          got: '0'
#     expected: '18442'
ok 7 - Completed all tests in t/postconfigure/03-revision.t
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 7.
dubious
        Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 6
        Failed 1/7 tests, 85.71% okay
Failed Test                   Stat Wstat Total Fail  List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------
t/postconfigure/03-revision.t    1   256     7    1  6
Failed 1/1 test scripts. 1/7 subtests failed.
Files=1, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.09 CPU)
Failed 1/1 test programs. 1/7 subtests failed.


On May 8, 2007, at 8:46 PM, James Keenan wrote:

Allison Randal wrote:
> This test seems to expect that the current revision and the revision
> where I last ran Configure.pl are always the same. Why?
>
> ------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projects/svn/parrot$ prove t/postconfigure/03- revision.t
> t/postconfigure/03-revision....ok 4/7#     Failed test
> (t/postconfigure/03-revision.t at line 32)
> t/postconfigure/03-revision....ok 5/7#          got: '18472'
> #     expected: '18469'
> t/postconfigure/03-revision....NOK 6# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 7.
> t/postconfigure/03-revision....dubious
>         Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> DIED. FAILED test 6
>         Failed 1/7 tests, 85.71% okay
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> t/postconfigure/03-revision.t    1   256     7    1  14.29%  6
> Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/7 subtests failed, 85.71% okay.

Please see my response of a few minutes ago to a similar question from Andy Dougherty. Can you answer the same sort of questions I asked in that email? Also, can you send the output of 'prove -v' on the failing test?

Thank you very much.
kid51


--
Will "Coke" Coleda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to