On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:24:28PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > Jonathan Worthington wrote: > >I guess that doing so will involve re-writing a lot of the current > >Configure system and build tools into something that compiles down to > >PBC (and then just ship something very basic that can run a PBC). > Whoa. I meant, have some kinda miniparrot that can run a PBC but is pure > ANSI C or something. Long day...
I like this approach. It feels viable. Nicholas Clark
