Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2007 23:01 schrieb chromatic: > On Thursday 29 March 2007 13:27, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > Compactness does not supersede good design. > > > > Basically & in theorie yes, but don't always forget performance. > > Until we get completeness and correctness and cleanliness, I really think > we should forget performance. It's awfully difficult to profile code that > doesn't do everything it needs to do, and it's comparitively easy to > optimize simple code.
I think I've clearly outlined where the real problems are. Moving a pointer _now_ here or there isn't the issue. And re optimizaion again: [0] Well, you would have to prove that there are typically a lot of event code switches and that the related save/resore sequence of current_ ptrs does hurt more than joe average sub call performance penalties your patch imposes, but lets forget that for a while ;) > -- c leo
