chromatic wrote: >> Mixing things together is everything that you are attempting to resolve. >> Why are you making excuses for not achieving this? >> > > I don't think that's entirely fair. James's experiment here is an > experiment, > and if it fails we can learn something from it. >
Yes, sorry if it wasn't clear - I commend the goal and effort but ultimately this particular experiment should be declared a dead end. > Personally, I find that using SVK and creating local branches saves me from > this trouble, but I have commit access to Parrot and that might not be the > easiest solution for other people. > Right, and SVK tracks the merge progress with its merge tickets - so long as you're merging between mirror paths. Otherwise its merge tickets refer to your local repository. > Perhaps an alternate solution is to document how people can create and update > their own local branches effectively even if they don't have commit access > (or whether they prefer SVK or Git). > For sure. Sam.