Allison Randal wrote:
More specifically: If you have any questions related to a PDD in clip,
please add them to a QUESTIONS section at the end of the PDD. For
requirements, use REQUIREMENTS. Neither of these sections will live in
the final version of the PDD, so it's a flag for me to process the
discussion. (And it's enormously easier to roll the discussion into
the PDD when it's collected together like that than scattered across
several months of email. Especially considering how terrible
Thunderbird's full-text searching is.)
OK, so I've added a REQUIREMENTS section to the objects PDD now and
filled it out with some (hopefully most) of what Perl 6 and .Net need as
a start. I know I've missed some things, and I'll bet my Perl 6
requirements are somewhat lacking in the details - if you object to
anything I wrote, commits and patches to fix it would be great. :-)
What would be *really* great, though, is if implementers of other
languages that do OO stuff could contribute their needs to this section.
If you would rather send a patch than ci (or don't hve a commit bit),
just send it along to the list and I'll make sure it's applied.
Thanks!
Jonathan
- Re: OO Requirements [was Re: classnames and HLL names... Jonathan Worthington
-
