Am Sonntag, 22. Oktober 2006 20:56 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud: > I strongly disagree. I don't think that a subclass should have to > be named as a sub-namespace of its parent class.
Namespace and classes are currently totally orthogonal. You are declaring a subclass (not a sub-namespace) with all the implications for naming it. There was some discussion re unifying namespace and class 'namespaces' but it stalled. The "class isa NameSpace" thingy is still undecided. leo
