Hi all, so by now we’ve had quibbles about the “irregularity” of `skip`, `can_ok` and `isa_ok`, and a suggestion that the test name always go first. Conclusion?
Had they been named parameters, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. And you know what? We don’t even need Test::More::NextGen to implement that. All functions as they stand could unambiguously accept a hashref as their single argument. The downside is that test scripts will look busier. Had this been planned for from the start, then the parameter lists could have been designed to accept some positional as well as some named parameters and the named parameters could live outside a hashref, thereby avoiding the visual clutter. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
