On 7/15/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't particularly like that this is a silent failure, but I'm not sure of a robust way to fix that. In any event, I reread the docs a couple of times before I realized I was being stupid. That suggests to me that this little nit could be improved.
Or warnings turned on. :P But the current warning is unintentional. I'll slap in a thing which checks that the second argument is numeric.
