On 7/11/06, Jonathan T. Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian Langworth wrote:
> I mentioned YAML with a pretense I failed to mention -- that we
> wouldn't parse the YAML. That's already been done, and there are
> plenty of parsers.
I agree with this. YAML has been done and done again, in every
language. It works, it's tested. I don't think we need EVERY feature
of YAML; Syck is enough for my everyday use, anyway.
if i recall correctly, syck doesn't handle utf-8/16. does/will tap
care about that?
oh, and while i'm thinking about it, i think it would be wise to
include a tap version in the tap header, so as this protocol changes,
parsers will have a chance to handle different tap versions
gracefully.
~jerry
