On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:55, chromatic wrote: > On Wednesday 05 July 2006 12:28, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > I'd like to suggest a generic proposal for the Perl Foundation Grants. > > Note that I'm not going to take it myself, because I just started a new > > job and would like to commit to it. However, I can be the mentor for this > > grant. I'm posting it here to get some reactions before I put it in my > > use.perl.org journal, etc. > > You want TPF to pay some unspecifed and unidentified other person
Not exactly. I suggested that if anyone is interested in working on Test::Run, he can file a proposal for a grant saying he'd like to work on it with me as a mentor. I still don't have anyone who can work on it. This is similar to Adam Kennedy's "Strawberry Perl" developer wanted: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/29174 Albeit mine was possibly too badly phrased. > to > continue a fork of a core module that can't ever replace the core module > because of its licensing? > Test::Run has no licensing problems. Some parts of it are under the Perl dual-license. The other parts are under the MIT X11 license. One can easily re-license MIT X11-licensed code under any other licence. Sheez... Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the bottom 5%.
