Luke Closs wrote: > Maybe slightly unrelated, but have you guys considered adding some extra > (optional) meta info to the TAP spec? For instance at $work, we group > our individual assertions into higher level tests like this: > > # TITLE: Some test case > ok 1 > ok 2 - awesome > not ok 3 > > I believe we also have an ACTION: tag.
another useful meta info for TAP: # LINENO: (pugs links test messages to higlighted version of the test script) -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP
