Cool, it's manageable for now and our current testing -- using sometimes large, monolithic Test::More .t files -- is no more flexible so there's no loss in the move, but the flexibility will be appreciated when you get around to it. Thanks for putting Test::Class together Adrian!
Andrew On 5/31/06 10:55 AM, "Adrian Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [apologies to andrew for a dupe - didn't notice it went to perl-qa] > > On 31 May 2006, at 14:35, Andrew Gianni wrote: > >> Let me start by admitting that I don't know a whole lot about xUnit >> testing. >> In fact, using Test::Class is really my first exposure to the idea, so >> perhaps I'm asking for something that doesn't make sense; please >> bear with >> me in case I am. >> > [excellent description snipped] > > In short > * Yes running one test method at a time is a sensible things to do. > * No - there currently isn't a simple way of doing this > * Good news - Ovid has submitted a patch to make it easy > * Bad news - I've been too bone idle to apply it > > Hopefully I will become less lazy soon :-) Should be in the next > release, which is well overdue. > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > ---- Andrew Gianni Administrative Computing Services Computing and Information Technology University at Buffalo 215 MFAC, Ellicott Complex Buffalo, NY 14261-0026 716.645.3587x7124
