> > Noone other than Mediawiki uses the Mediawiki syntax. I posit > that the reason is that that syntax blows chunks.
Actually dokuwiki uses an almost the exact same syntax as mediawiki.. except they invert the headers (== foo == stuff). as for a perl6 wiki.. I agree that there are already many many wiki's outthere the ones I like most noted above (media and doku), since I really like the syntax. but also both of them are written in php and as far as I've seen the code.. not particulary beautiful (ok dokuwiki is plain ugly but functional, mediawiki somewhat hard with major upgrades) and I dislike all perl wiki's I've seen. so IMHO there still is a market. on top of that.. some good clear visible code like with a wiki, would do the perl6 project good for news and momentum (and a php wiki would just look really bad i think). as for specs.. ofcourse I'm no [at]larry, but I'd like to see something that is lightweight and flexible in design. my 2ct, Sebastian S > > Regards, > -- > Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> -- [URL: http://web.expr42.net/] [Unique ID: Sun May 28 23:23:17 CEST 2006 (36)]
