Wrt your second problem, if this
> $arg_for<array> = [ ( 0 .. $arg_for<count> ) »*« $arg_for<scale> ];
is not rw so is not actually adding the entry to the hash (btw,
shouldn't the >>*<< be >>* as the right-hand operand is a scalar?), then
it is possible that
> > > And then I get an error telling me 'No such method in class
> > > Scalar: "&kv"' in the line
> > >
> > > for %buckets<w><array>.kv -> $i, $w {
means that %buckets<w><array> is being autovivisected (or whatever you
call it) as a Scalar element of %buckets<w>, rather than being a hash?Just a thought. I was under the impression that writing to an argument that is not rw should generate an error, unless it is copy, in which case it should do what it seems to be doing. It's possible that Pugs has not (yet) implemented this exactly, though. -- You can't run away forever, but there's nothing wrong with getting a good head start. You want to shut out the night, you want to shut down the sun, you want to shut away the pieces of a broken heart. `Rock and Roll Dreams Come True' (Steinman) http://surreal.istic.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
