On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:24:09AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > First, let me say I really like the changes to S05. Good work > once again. > > Here are my questions and comments. > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:07:51AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -(To get rule interpolation use an assertion - see below) > > +However, if C<$var> contains a rule object, rather attempting to > > +convert it to a string, it is called as if you said C<< <$var> >>. > > Does this mean it's a capturing rule? Or is it called as > if one had said C<< <?var> >>? (I would prefer it default > to non-capturing.)
Sorry, I meant C<< <?$var> >> here, except we don't really have a <?$var> syntax, so my question is just if it's capturing or non-capturing. (I still prefer non-capturing.) Pm
