* demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-05T10:23:45]
> On 4/5/06, Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That said, I don't dispute the point that it can be wildly obnoxious when
> > "Something::Trivial" requires DBD::MySQL and Data::Dump::Streamer when it
> > could use neither -- or at least rely on AnyDBM and Data::Dumper.  It will
> > just meant that fewer people want to use that trivial module because it
> > takes longer to install and is less well-tested by virtue of its
> > dependencies.
> 
> Interesting example. What module do you mean? I wasnt aware that there
> were very many modules that have dependencies on DDS. OTOH, if it has
> to do with proper serilization (of closures, or cyclic data
> structures) then Data::Dumper just wont cut it.

I was making a random example of something that used something it probably
didn't need, and that used something that might be emulable by core modules.

-- 
rjbs

Reply via email to