Steve,

What version of OpenBSD were you running (perhaps something old or
direct from CVS)?  

-J

--
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 03:13:18PM -0800, Joshua Isom via RT wrote:
> On OpenBSD 3.8 x86, I still get the failures with -0.0/0.0.  Check the 
> smokes...
> 
> On Mar 21, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:42:42AM -0800, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
> >>> [jhoblitt - Sun Jan 01 18:49:23 2006]:
> >>>
> >>> I've commited a possible fix for openbsd, cygwin, & solaris as
> >> changesets
> >>> r10839 & r10843.  I basically applied what Steve Peters proposed but
> >>> with the changes in math.c instead of creating init.c (as agreed to 
> >>> on
> >>> #parrot).
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't appear to have done anything for gcc/solaris... can 
> >>> someone
> >>> test openbsd and cygwin?
> >>
> >> These changes fixed OpenBSD and were used with NetBSD to allow it to
> >> pass all of its tests.  That leaves the issue open for Solaris and 
> >> Cygwin.
> >
> > Fantastic.  Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Can someone test this on Cygwin?
> >
> > -J
> >
> > --
> 
> 

Attachment: pgpPVlDhvis8d.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to