On Mar 5, 2006, at 13:52, Chris Dolan wrote:
Advice? While this example is contrived, the "eval { require ... }" idiom is used often in the wild, so this is not a wholly unrealistic scenario.
Of course it should be
eval { require Bar; 1; } or die $@;
But I agree that it seems like if the load failed in your eval, it
should fail for Test::More, too. But maybe even a failed require sets
the record in %INC?
Best, David
