On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:56:40AM +0000, Luke Palmer wrote: : Come to think of it, that seems backwards. After all, aren't: : : my Foo $x; : my $x of Foo; : : Equivalent?
Didn't answer this part... If --> and returns are different, than "of" probably sets the --> type rather than the "returns" type. Or maybe there's no distinction for non-subs, but it seems nice to associate "returns" with "return". Larry
