On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:33:36PM -0800, jerry gay wrote: > On 1/3/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Recently on IRC: > > > > < Debolaz> leo: You can see the patches I made at > > > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/lang/parrot/patches/ > > < Debolaz> The only one that's really needed to make things compile is > > patch-ac, but > > patch-ad might be of some interest. > > > > Folks, please check these patches and consider issues & integration > > into parrot trunk. > > > patch-aa (to MANIFEST) performs some well-needed cleanup, and seems > accurate. i suggest it gets applied.
I also thought that way and applied it. > patch-ab (to MANIFEST.generated) removes some filenames of files that > are not built by the default make target, but are built by the > parrot_utils target. i believe these files should not be removed from > MANIFEST.generated. the remainder of the patch performs necessary > cleanup, and should be applied. I applied the cleanup part. The *_shared entries aren't in MANIFEST.generated anymore. They are replaced by installable_* which may be shared or static, depending on the configuration. > patch-ac is freebsd-specific, i have no reason to disagree with it's > accuracy or appropriateness. if it works, it should be applied. I don't have a clue about freebsd. Can some freebsd people confirm that it works and is portable enough? > i have no comment on patch-ad. i have no idea what the naming > conventions for shared binaries should be. We don't have *_shared executables anymore. This patch isn't needed anymore. Regards, Flo -- BOFH excuse #146: Communications satellite used by the military for star wars.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
