Hi all!

Replying to myself, I should note that I found another problem in 
Test::Harness. Reading from the Test::Harness man page:

http://xrl.us/jb6q

<============
=item C<HARNESS_PERL>

Usually your tests will be run by C<$^X>, the currently-executing Perl.
However, you may want to have it run by a different executable, such as
a threading perl, or a different version.

If you're using the F<prove> utility, you can use the C<--perl> switch.
============>

However prove does not have a "--perl" switch:

<==========
$ prove --perl /usr/bin/perl t/*.t
Unknown option: p
==========>

I also cannot find it anywhere in the code.

I hope some people would be able to address the issues I've raised after the 
weekend, as it is now the winters Holidays vacation.

And before I forget: Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas, everyone!

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish

On Sunday 25 December 2005 13:46, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> In Test::Harness, one can find the following statement:
>
> <<<<
> # Some experimental versions of OS/2 build have broken $?
> my $Ignore_Exitcode = $ENV{HARNESS_IGNORE_EXITCODE};
>
>
> However:
>
> <<<<
> shlomi:~/Download/unpack/Test-Harness-2.56$ grep -rE 'Ignore|IGNORE' .
> ./lib/Test/Harness.pm:my $Ignore_Exitcode = $ENV{HARNESS_IGNORE_EXITCODE};
> ./lib/Test/Harness.pm:=item C<HARNESS_IGNORE_EXITCODE>
>
>
> Meaning, that neaither the environment variable nor the variable that has
> been assigned from it are referenced. Is it because this functionality was
> removed or because these lines were accidently removed? In any case, it
> should be fixed.
>
> I am asking this because I'm working on Test::Run which is derived from
> Test::Harness, and would like to clean up the global variables there, and
> remove the handling of the environment variables to a separate module
> (Test::Run::CmdLine).
>
> Regards,
>
>       Shlomi Fish
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Shlomi Fish      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage:        http://www.shlomifish.org/
>
> 95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the
> bottom 5%.

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage:        http://www.shlomifish.org/

95% of the programmers consider 95% of the code they did not write, in the
bottom 5%.

Reply via email to