On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:08:24AM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:16:35PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > As of r10458 Parrot doesn't load_bytecode the same file [1] twice anymore. > > Neat - this is a fine approximate solution until we have real pbc > hashing, and *may* continue to be necessary even with hashing, > depending on whether we can count on reproducible hashes from > successive compilations of the same source file.
Surely in that case we instead choose to hash based on the source file? (Or the Parrot equivalent of hashing C code by hashing the C pre-processor output. Something akin to how ccache works.) Nicholas Clark
