I really do believe that docs/imcc should be renamed to docs/pir and that all references to imcc be removed form docs/pir/*.pod.
Are there any objections to this? -J -- On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:10:13PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > Perhaps docs/pir would be better as I can't think of a reason to salt > the user docs with references to imcc. > > Cheers, > > -J > > -- > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:48:53AM -0800, Jerry Gay via RT wrote: > > applied as r10353. > > > > i made some formatting changes and updated links in the documents, and > > had to modify the manifest and some html document generation code. all > > in all, a pretty simple change. > > > > it would be great if somebody could take a look at the docs as a whole > > and rework them where necessary (add index info, make sure links are > > valid, format <80 chars per line, etc.) but i believe we already have > > tickets for these things. > > > > ticket resolved. > > ~jerry
pgpT9AThgGEuH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
