Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:25:13PM -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote: > > Or, perhaps more accurately, `P1 := ...\n assign P0, P1`? > > No, PIR doesn't do that kind of thing (allocating P registers) behind > your back. If a sequence needs a second P register, PIR will make you > name it. Somewhere. Otherwise you'd be unable to e.g. control object > lifetime by nulling the register. (Right, Leo?)
That would mean that `P0 = opcode P2` is illegal, right? (That's why I had originally suggested that `P1 = ...` means `P1 := ...\n assign P0, P1`.) -- matt diephouse http://matt.diephouse.com
