On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:18:17PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > Personally I haven't had much trouble with '=' and I don't think > I ever use ':='. Perhaps I've just trained myself to the current > implementation, but I like that the shorter '=' does what I tend > to want/expect and I write an explicit 'assign' or 'set' opcode when > I need something different.
Just for clarity: In stating the above I wasn't intending to express a preference for or against changing things, just that the current situation doesn't cause me a lot of confusion. (I've dealt with C and Java long enough to know that sometimes assignment doesn't always mean exactly what you might initially expect.) I don't have any problem adapting to whatever is ultimately decided. Pm
