Will Coleda wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:38 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
handler:
get_results "(0,0)", P0, S0
Currently, partcl stores extra information in P5[9] - Would it be
available as P0[9] in your example? (If so, is the message still
available as P0[0] ?
Sure. Nothing has changed in the layout of the Exception object. I've
described and implemented argument passing to exception handlers.
If so, why do we specify S0 here?)
Just for convenience. Named argument syntax would really simplify the
task. The exception handler could just specify, what it wants, e.g.:
handler:
get_results "(...)", "exception": P2, "arg9": Icoke
leo
