On 11/14/05, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i've added six more tests to PGE for nested matches, (based on a perl5 > bug report i saw,) as parrot revision 9973, in t/p6rules/capture.t. it > seems that > rx /((\w+)+)/ > is failing on long strings, just like it does in the perl5 bug i saw > (#8685). however, parrot doesn't segfault like perl does, at least not > on my platform. > err... actually, patrick corrected me. the test had a scoping problem which set the rule target to "". it's been fixed in r9975 and those two tests are now passing.
> i'm not a regexp compiler. > i'm not a perl compiler, either :| ~jerry