Hi! On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:34:09AM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote: > To encourage authors to correct this oversight, I propose a new pair > of Kwalitee tests. Both would be nice, but if either of them were > implemented, I'd be thrilled. I'd prefer that someone else implement > the test (lack of tuits), but if there is approval for the idea > without a motivated implementer I will take a hack at it. > > 1) has_license -- check for the presence of a file named something > .. > 2) has_meta_yml_license -- check for a META.yml field named
Nice ideas. I would add them to CPANTS, but at the moment I haven't got *one* spare minute, as we are in the finishing stage of renovating our new appartment and moving there. You might have noticed that there wasn't a CPANTS update in the last weeks, for the same reason... I'll be back to to (semi-)serious CPANTS-work after 13th Nov. (BTW, If you're in/near Vienna and fancy some free workout (carry our stuff down 4 floors and then up 3) drop me a line. :-) -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}
