[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric) writes: >> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:38:55 +0200, Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Yesterday I spend some hours getting pugs to understand >> > translitterations with multiple ranges in each pair. E.g.
> Actually its been fixed already. Of course i think the whole thing was then > broken again, i was planning on checking it out sometime tonight after > someone else figures out the current $?SELF being undeclared bug. Saturday I think everything but the test suite was working in some way. It needed some changes in the syntax like explicit parens around pairs and the testsuite wasn't corrected for this. Would the prober thing be to update the tests for the syntax that is working and maybe add a extra test for the syntax as speced? I planed to look at it but found something to read instead. > ;) BTW it doesn't need any hash i just needed pairs which it had for > about an hour before things changed again. lol. so is development on > pugs I guess, here today, gone tomorrow, back again another day. Yeah, very fun way to confuse a newbie into perl6-hacking but thanks for all you help. -- Peter Makholm | Yes, you can fight it, but in the end the ultimate [EMAIL PROTECTED] | goal of life is to have fun http://hacking.dk | -- Linus Torvalds
